Comment: This is really the epicenter of the subject/book that I translated (draft). The book will soon be on sale at all outlets titled: Turn Your World Upside Down Living Seductionology – The Theory and Practice of Positive and Negative Intelligent Seduction. If you like what you read so far, I can create a section for the book itself as it doesn’t really fit into my reality, in other words, it’s all true but I think you and I as readers have already passed this stage of understanding. At least I have and I really had to act different while working on the book because this egocentric author wanted/insisted that I change my life into his philosophy. Well, I already live that life I just use different words like “Fuck off and don’t touch me”, and “The world is what we make it”. I agree with his work, it’s just that I think he complicates something that is very simple: “truth”. I believe that his work will be honored and purchased, but I also believe this reality already exists using different terminology. You be the judge, I’m just the translator.
In her book: Molecules of Emotion, Candace B. Pert considers the receptors and ligands to attract and seduce by some invisible force. Receptors as sensory molecules that behave like radar and at the cellular level act like our sense organs such as eyes, ears, nose, tongue, fingers and skin, and are ready to capture and receive the messages that the ligands transport. Thus, receptors and ligands act as Interactive Intelligent Seduced-Seducer who have a tendency to seduce and be seduced. Pert explains this in her book in the following way:
“Binding. It’s sex on a molecular level … If the receptors are the first component molecules of emotion, ligands are the other. Jumping of ligands on receptors is called binding, due to which the ligand through its molecular properties of the receptor conveys the message … … if the cell is an engine that drives all life, then the receptors are the buttons on the control panel of this machine, a specific peptide (or some other type of ligand) makes the finger that presses the button and starts the engine … Now we are ready to consider my theory to argue that these biochemical physiological substrates of emotion, and are the molecular foundations of what we experience as feelings, sensations, thoughts, impulses, and perhaps even as a spirit or soul. ”
That which makes Interactive Intelligent Seduced-Seducer in a new aspect of phylogeny researchers call ‘reticular evolution’ – ‘also network evolution’, in which it claims that the species do not separate between each other, only in an arms race, but also connect in new units and thus, primarily connecting different lineages, creating a new species. In a biosphere, comprehensive symbiosis tells us that the Interactive Intelligent Seduced-Seducer is in the entire animal and plant world. The hunter and the hunted were sent to each other – when one dies of extinction so does the other; they win or lose together.
- Scott Peck in his book: The Road Less Traveled: A New Psychology of Love, Traditional Values, and Spiritual Growth, cites two examples in which a person is treated as Interactive Intelligent Seduced-Seducer:
“Love is, as we will continually realize, a two-way street, a reciprocal phenomenon in which the receiver also gives, the giver also receives… we have little understanding of the origin and mechanism of instinct … although we know very little about the instincts we still believe that they operate within the boundaries of the individual who owns them … Maybe we do not only have instinct to preserve our life, but also to preserve the lives of others.”
Symbiosis is a close, often long-term interaction of two organisms of different species, because of the benefits of at least one of them. Of the organisms that live in pairs, the larger one is usually the host, and the other is a parasite or mutualist. The relationship of organisms in symbiosis can be: a parasitic (harmful to one), commensal (one benefit, while others do not benefit or harm) and mutual (convenient for both). The human body has about 10 times more bacteria, fungi and viruses than body cells. These micro-organisms that make up the ecological community of all life forms on and in our bodies, are called the microbiome, and have a tremendous impact on our health. How does our body cooperate with our microbiomes? Who are we really if mixed with microbiomes contain only a tenth of our mutual system? How do we behave as Interactive Seduced-seducers in such a symbiotic way and the community and who is the boss in that community?
Humans also live within different types of symbiosis or coexistence which is expressed in love, marriage, friendship, society, nation, politics, economy, finance, science, religion, commerce, education, entertainment, sports, and culture and so on. So, symbiosis shows us that living things are Interactive Intelligent Seduced-Seducer.
Marco Iacaboni, in his book: Mirroring People: The New Science of How We Connect with Others uncovers humans as Interactive Seduced-Seducers:
“In this chapter I have already stated that the interaction between the self and the other (the baby smiles, the mother laughs) but at a very early age shapes mirror neurons. Mirror neurons strongly connect me and the other … Did mirror neurons form and shaped by the original inter-subjectivity? I believe that’s correct. ”
Jacques M. E. Lacan came to the idea of mirroring in the other much earlier than the mirror neurons were discovered. Darian Leader and Judy Groves in the book: Lacan for Beginners, asks the question: how to interpret the mimicry unless it’s not an accurate statement of evolutionary biology that mimicry is protection from predators? They then state that Roger Caillois, a French thinker who dealt with the theme of masks, games and people’s attitudes towards the animal kingdom, claimed that there is a kind of natural law according to which the organisms are trapped in their environment. For example, they will then take on the color of the space in which they are located. Thus, animals seduce the environment and the environment seduces them.
Jamshed Bharucha, a psychology professor, rector and vice-president of Tufts University, in his Mini Essay: The Synchronization of Brains, talks about the impact of synchronization on human brains while behaving as Interactive Intelligent Seduced-Seducers:
“In the second place, I postulated that music synchronizes the state of the brain affecting emotions, movement and pattern recognition – which reinforces the cohesion of the group. As in the case of traditions or rituals, that which synchronizes, may not in itself be useful; it doesn’t even have to be important that it synchronizes. It is a very fact that synchronization can be a powerful source of collective action. ”
Malabou shows that plasticity of the brain is in direct opposition to the rigidity (stiffness) and is its complete antonym. Therefore, we can view the plasticity of the brain as the Seduceist-seducer. Seductionary dynamism of language and all communication activities, as well as sensory and mental perception are linked to the interaction of the Interactive Seduced and seducer. D. F. Peat in his book: Synchronicitys shows that in the following way:
“Linguist Benjamin Lee Whorf, in the first half of this century, argued that language is very connected with awareness and that within each language thoughts about nature and society is enclosed. Whorf’s view that linguistic structure directs the speaker to think and act in a certain way, has caused considerable controversy among linguists…
Therefore such a dynamic combination goes beyond mere theory or area of knowledge and is spread throughout the culture pervading every aspect of life, including social structure together with that of customs, beliefs, activities, and the very relations between individuals. Of course, this is the reason why it is so difficult for the West to accept the view of the East about the universe and their interest in synchronicity. Even before the time of Shang, the overall view of the integrity of things had to be developed in China with the emphasis on connectivity and harmony that has permeated social institutions, language and all aspects of daily life. Therefore, it would be equally difficult for ancient Chinese to question the notion of synchronicity, as well as the average Westerner concept of linear time and historical sequence of events. ”
Sometimes, in order to be a first-class or powerful seducer it is more important to find ourselves in an environment where there are many of those who are well disposed to our seduction. This is the reason why large religious institutions, national, political, imperial, fashion and consumers are successful seducers. This is confirmed by Nicholas A. Christakis and James H. Fowler book: Connected – Surprising Power of Social Networks and How They Affect Our Lives, explains that in order for the expansion of certain influences to be effective, besides the seducers; there has to be those who are prone to fall under that seductive influence.
“In some recent work, specific circumstances are explained under which the influential individuals are most likely to take advantage of their ability to influence. Apparently influential people are not enough, it is also necessary that the population make a person prone to influences and it may happen that the expansion rate of innovation depends more on the features and the number of people prone to influences rather than influential individuals. ”
Yuval Noah Harari in a popular-science book: Sapiens – A Brief History of Humanity believes that we ourselves as a species created religion and belief in the value of that exchange. Beliefs are a powerful force that drives and maintains our values. Strong imagination and abstract thinking is something that distinguishes us from other species. For Harari; money, government, human rights, corporations, the stock market does not exist in reality. The above listed is a result of human thinking, but at the end of the day, money in our hands is real. All that is man-made – money, government, human rights, God – is based on some kind of religious belief, and belief in the stated are different types of religion. So, we are believers, not only in the religious definition of the term. We know this best at the moment when we become atheists, when we realize what we believe in is fiction, he said. Everything that exists in the world is in accordance with the natural laws, including homosexuality. Harari explains our belief in the following way:
“Yes, a piece of paper is real, but its value is the result of our collective imagination. It functions exactly because it exists in the collective imagination. If that existed only in my mind, it wouldn’t work. However, when millions of people believe in a fiction, then it becomes a very powerful force. And while millions of people believe that a piece of paper is worth a piece of bread and with that piece of paper can go to the store and for them to get a piece of bread, it works. It is absolutely the case with God or human rights. If millions of people believe that you join the Crusades and die, go to heaven, even if it is completely untrue, it becomes a powerful force. Human rights are not a biological fact, there is no law written in the human DNA, that we invented, but when hundreds of millions of people believe in them, they become a powerful force in society and politics…
It would be impossible for people to work without some fiction, such as money, god or human rights. It is not necessary to have a specific fiction. Some would say that society will collapse if people do not believe in God, but this is not true. There are many companies that work very well and without belief in God. Instead of god, those people in these societies believe in something else. ”
Thus, the human species on the basis of imagination and abstract thinking creates a new seductive reality that with the help of the collective belief in these myths and fiction built into the material and spiritual reality of the collective world-consciousness as values, rules of behavior and activity and method of exchange. This is proof that we live in an interactive Seduced-seductive World-consciousness which we are part of. So we seduce reality World-consciousness, while at the same time it seduces us.
Geoffrey Miller in his work: The Mating Mind indicates that women and men were evolutionarily built to be Interactive Intelligent Seduced-Seducer:
“Males typically have no reason to reject any partner. The fact that both men and women have developed specific sexual ornaments shows that in human evolution, male and female choices were important If both sexes were selective when it came to body; it is possible that they were selective when it comes to the mind. ”
Bryan Sykes, professor of genetics at the Institute of Molecular Medicine at the University of Oxford, author of the book: “Adam’s Curse: A Future Without Men” says that science explains why it is that in sexual selection as an interaction requires participation of Interactive Intelligent Seduced-Seducer who are equipped with adjusted transceivers that is our genetic destiny:
“Eloquence is not of any use to the suitor whose object of desire does not know how to open its mouth.”
In the book: Casanova, Hermann Kesten in the following way describes one of the greatest adventurers, lovers and Interactive Intelligent Seduced-Seducer in the history of mankind:
“Half of his life was a single delicacy, interrupted by breaks, and he shared that delicacy with a hundred or two hundred women. Sometimes he would want to marry one of them, but it never came to that. For many he provided a good game – he was an unselfish pimp, just as he (in his own way) wanted to be unselfish lover, moreover, he was, if you look at his entire life, a seduced-seducer. This incredible hero of frequent love, lover of one general’s wife, he called himself the victim of women, la dupe des femmes (deceived by women).”
For Robert Greene in his book:” The Art of Seduction” there is 9 types of seducers. Each type has a distinctive character that comes from deep within and creates a seductive attraction. 1) The sirens have plenty of sexual energy and know how to use it. 2) The Rakes (predators) insatiably love the opposite sex and love their cravings. 3) The ideal lovers have an aesthetic sensibility that of incorporating the romance. 4) The Dandys like to play with their image by creating observable androgenic bait. 5) Natural deceivers are spontaneous and open. 6) The Coquettes are self-sufficient, with a fascinating cold essence. 7) The Charmers know how to meet, they are social creatures. 8) The Charismatic have unusual confidence. 9) The Stars are ethereal and draped in mystery. 10) The Anti-seducers are the opposite: insecure, self-absorbed, and unable to grasp the psychology of another person, they literally repel.
We must eradicate all anti-seductionary tendencies at all costs because the anti-seducer is unsure of himself, preoccupied with himself and does not offer us anything except a prickly ball full of his personal problems. Although at first sight it might be difficult to figure out what kind of seductive appeal he might have, these kind of people need only recall that the famous director and actor Woody Allen for years successfully deceived the public, but also many women, winning them over with constant whining over their own insecurities and often quite imaginary problems. And Jean Baudrillard says that we seduce with our weaknesses, but not strong traits, which is also incorrect and exclusive thinking, because we seduce with our weakness and strengths, both positively and negatively. Greene proposes to think of these nine types as silhouettes. Only if we step into them and allow them to grow within us, can we begin to develop a seductive character that will bring us unlimited power.
Along with Greene’s 9 types of seducers and anti-seducers, describes 18 types of victims (a Interactive Seduceds whom he calls victims or targets) each of which something is missing in their lives with a crack that can be filled in. Knowing with which type we are dealing with, will make it easier to put into practice the ideas from both parts of the book. If we ignore any part of this book, Greene warns us that we will be incomplete seducers. By practicing what is described in the book, we will slowly feel as we absorb the poison under the skin and will see everything as seduction including our view of the world. According to Greene, the people around us are potential victims of seduction, but we need to know which type of victim they are. The victims are characterized according to what they think they lack in life; adventure, attention, romance, bad experiences, mental or physical stimulation, etc. Once we identify its type we have the necessary ingredients to seduce. We will be the ones who will give them what they lack, that they cannot provide for themselves. In the study of potential victims, learn to see the reality behind their masks (looks). Never try to seduce the same type as we are.
Through the victim theory, Greene argues that nobody in the world feels complete and whole. We all have a sense of some cracks in our character, something that we want and need, but we alone cannot provide. When we fall in love it’s usually with someone who fills that fissure. Let’s focus on the cracks, pieces that are missing in the victim’s psyche, because it is raw material for any kind of seduction. We have to understand that people are constantly sending signals about what they lack. Desire for completeness regardless of whether it is an illusion or reality, if it came from another person, that person has great power over them. We can call them victims of seduction but they are almost always voluntary victims. In the victim theory, Greene describes 18 types of victims, each with a lack that dominates. Although our target may show more than one type there is usually a common need connecting them. The most important thing is to remove the habit to hold opinions that people have the same disadvantages as we do. Maybe we are hungry for protection and comfort, but if we give it to others thinking that they need it, it is more likely that we will thereby choke and push it away. Never try to seduce someone our own type, because we will be as part of a puzzle that is missing the same parts.
Greene’s victim types are: 1) The reformed rake; 2)The disappointed dreamer; 3)The pampered royal; 4)The new pride; 5)The crushed star; 6)The novice; 7)The conqueror; 8)The exotic fetishist; 9)The drama queen; 10)The professor; 11)The beauty; 12)The aging baby; 13)The rescuer; 14)The Roué; 15)The idol worshipper; 16)The sensualist; 17)The lonely leader; 18)The floating gender.
After all this, Greene suggests to his readers that these nine seductive types should be understood as different types of mantles that can be worn according to their needs once they realize their own predispositions and begin to build their own seductive and manipulative profile. Of course, the author points out, before starting the seductive hike; one should learn and practice the four stages of seduction.
What does it mean to a voluntary sacrifice if we as seducers choose and practice different tactics and strategies in order to force the victim into submission?! Greene separates the participants in the seductive games by the seducer and the victim or target, rather than looking at the positive interaction of seduction as two equal and benevolent seduced-seducer. As Baudrillard says, no one can be seduced if they have not already been seduced or in a state of seduction (Seduceist), this boundary between the seducer and Seduced disappears. Another problem that occurs with Greene is that he has no division between positive and negative seduction, and, although it is for him morally negative, Nietzschism (Nietzsche philosophy) rises above good and evil, and by that, trying to avoid responsibility and objection of his own conscience. Green’s seducer usually ‘negatively’ seduces the victim, and the victim unconsciously ‘positively’ seduces the seducer. It’s not a conscious mutual seduction of two equal Interactive Intelligent Seduced-Seducer.
This Consciousness Handbook that you are now reading, can help those that Pascal Bruckner in his book: The Paradox of Love, describes below; in a way that they realize that seduction is not only mutually merging two sexual victims of seduction, which have a low or no criteria at all, in order to fulfill their seductionary mission, but to realize that nobody is an isolated island (the seducer or seduced), but that all act bound together as Interactive Intelligent Seduced-Seducer:
“Some people created a way of life from seduction. Since they cannot resist any opportunity, they give preference to relationships that are just formed. They get all fired toward strangers, and then leave them as soon as someone else appears. The love episode with them is short, it ends almost as soon as it began, everything happens in frenzied rhythm, as soon as they feel the stimulus; they need to execute what they intended on. What is a man-eater? What is a womanizer? They are fans of digression. They prefer situations over people, catching the catch, the stimulus of feelings; it’s totally irrelevant with whom that is. They are equally it turned on by ugly women, fat man; they care very little about the packaging, when the only important thing is the new impulse. The duration, giving and receiving, is not interesting to them; they find their joy in long-term contacts, in the vortex of romantic dates. ”
The seducer is always seduced by something. The seducer and the Seduced seduce at the same time so that they are also the influencers and are influenced through mutual exchanges, inter-dependence, action and adventure, and therefore are marked as Interactive Intelligent Seduced-Seducers. Since everything in world-consciousness affects everything else, everything is Interactive Intelligent Seduced-Seducer at the most basic particles of matter, a particle transfer of force, space, time, minerals, and simple living beings, to complex structures like Creator, universe, language and consciousness. In the state of seduction, nobody can be a hunter-seducer yet not a prey-Seduced as well. In the same way they can’t only be seduced or be a victim (target) because he is forced to any reaction or action that will complete the seductive influence, action or conversion of the one who he seduces. There are seductive influences, as well as restrictions on the seductive influence, but also the possibility of crossing limits. The Interactive Intelligent Seduced-Seducer may only be active directly in dimensions where there is an interaction in which he can seduce and be seduced, while in other dimensions where there is no direct influence and action, he seduces and is seduced indirectly through other Interactive Intelligent Seduced-Seducer (Intelligent Seduction ) on which he has impact and effect. Seductive transformation in the interaction of two or more Interactive Intelligent Seduced-Seducer will depend on the power and the impact and effects of each one of them. All things being, phenomena and concepts seduce a man and he seduces them. So, this Intelligent Seduction paradigm offers us the possibility through the eyes and mind of the Interactive Intelligent Seduced-Seducer to view them and others; as well as everything that surrounds us as Interactive Intelligent Seduced-Seducer and on that basis, we execute thoughts, feelings, experiences, influences and transformations.